CORBAN v. CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, L.L.C.

No. 2014-0804.

149 Ohio St.3d 512 (2016)

2016-Ohio-5796

CORBAN v. CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, L.L.C., ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 15, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Volkema, Thomas, Miller & Scott, L.P.A., Michael S. Miller , and Daniel R. Volkema ; and Critchfield & Johnston and Steven J. Shrock , for petitioner.

Jones Day, Jeffery D. Ubersax , and Dean C. Williams ; and Thornburg & Bean and Charles H. Bean , for respondent North American Coal Royalty Company.

Reed Smith, L.L.P., Nicolle R. Snyder Bagnell , and Kevin C. Abbott , for respondents Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., CHK Utica, L.L.C., Dale Pennsylvania Royalty, L.P., Larchmont Resources, L.L.C., and Total E & P USA, Inc.

Kegler Brown Hill & Ritter Co., L.P.A., Andrew J. Sonderman , John P. Brody , and Margeaux Kimbrough , in support of petitioner, for amici curiae Gulfport Energy Corporation, Protégé Energy III, L.L.C., and Paloma Resources, L.L.C.

Michael DeWine , Attorney General, Eric E. Murphy , State Solicitor, and Samuel C. Peterson , Deputy Solicitor, in support of petitioner, for amicus curiae the state of Ohio.

Krugliak, Wilkins, Griffiths & Dougherty Co., L.P.A., Gregory W. Watts , Matthew W. Onest , David E. Butz , and William G. Williams , in support of petitioner, for amici curiae Jeffco Resources, Inc., Christopher and Veronica Wendt, Carol S. Miller, Mark and Kathy Rastetter, Douglas Henderson, John Yaskanich, Djuro and Vesna Kovacic, Brett and Kim Trissel, and Steven E. and Diane Cheshier.

Bricker & Eckler, L.L.P., Matthew W. Warnock , Daniel C. Gibson , and Daniel E. Gerken , in support of respondents regarding the first certified question, for amici curiae the Noon, Shepherd, Greegor, Merecka, and Kinney Families.

PFEIFER, J., dissents as to the first certified question and concurs as to the second certified question, with an opinion joined by O'NEILL, J.


{¶ 1} The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, submitted two certified questions of Ohio law in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. 9.01:

1. Does the 2006 version or the 1989 version of the [Dormant Mineral Act] apply to claims asserted after 2006 alleging that the rights...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases