STATE EX REL. OHIO CIV. SERV. EMPS. ASSN. v. STATE

No. 2014-0319.

146 Ohio St.3d 315 (2016)

2016-Ohio-478

THE STATE EX REL. OHIO CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. THE STATE OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 11, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Melle , for appellees and cross-appellants, Ohio Civil Service Employees Association, David Combs, Clair Crawford, Lori Leach Douce, Margo Hall, Sheila Herron, Daniel Karcher, Rebecca Sayers, Angela Schuster, Troy Tackett, Kathy Tinker, Lisa Zimmerman, and ProgressOhio.org.

Taft Stettinius & Hollister, L.L.P., Charles R. Saxbe , James D. Abrams , and Celia M. Kilgard , for appellees Corrections Corporation of America and CCA Western Properties, Inc.

Michael DeWine , Attorney General, and Eric E. Murphy , State Solicitor, for appellants and cross-appellees state of Ohio, Governor John R. Kasich, Attorney General Michael DeWine, Secretary of State Jon Husted, Auditor of State David Yost, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and its director, Gary C. Mohr, Ohio Department of Administrative Services and its director, Robert Blair, Treasurer Josh Mandel, and the Office of Budget and Management and its director, Timothy S. Keen.

Sutter O'Connell, Adam Martin , and Kevin W. Kita , for appellant and cross-appellee Management & Training Corporation.

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, and Nicholas A. Serrano , urging affirmance in part and reversal in part for amicus curiae AFSCME International.

Buckley King, L.P.A., Robert J. Walter , Thomas I. Blackburn , and Diem N. Kaelber , urging affirmance in part and reversal in part for amici curiae Ohio Association of Public School Employees/AFSCME Local 4, AFL-CIO, Fraternal Order of Police of Ohio, Inc., and American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Ohio Council 8.


{¶ 1} This appeal asks whether 2011 Am.Sub.H.B. No. 153 ("H.B. 153"), the budget bill for the 2012-2013 biennium, violates the Ohio Constitution. Specifically, we consider whether H.B. 153 violates the one-subject rule in Article II, Section 15(D) of the Ohio Constitution or the prohibition against state financial involvement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases