1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 139 Ohio
  5. 139 Ohio St.3d 275 (2014)
 

DANIEL v. DANIEL

No. 2012-2113.

139 Ohio St.3d 275 (2014)

2014-Ohio-1161

DANIEL, Appellant, v. DANIEL, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 26, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Tesno , for appellant.

O'NEILL, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, we consider whether unvested military retirement benefits are assets to be considered in a divorce property division. While there is always a degree of uncertainty regarding the precise value of such benefits, it is beyond dispute that they do have value, even if that value will become fixed only in the future. Accordingly, a trial court must take such benefits into account when determining a division of property....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases