STATE v. HOLDCROFT

Nos. 2012-1325 and 2012-1441.

137 Ohio St.3d 526 (2013)

2013-Ohio-5014

1 N.E.3d 382

THE STATE OF OHIO, Appellee, v. HOLDCROFT, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 20, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan K. Miller , Wyandot County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Kristopher A. Haines , Assistant Ohio Public Defender, for appellant.

O'DONNELL and KENNEDY, JJ., dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.


O'NEILL, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, we must again consider when a trial court has the authority to correct a sentence when one of the sanctions originally imposed by the trial court is void. We hold that a trial court cannot add a term of postrelease control as a sanction for a particular offense after the defendant has already served the prison term for that offense, even if the defendant remains in prison for other offenses.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases