1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 135 Ohio
  5. 135 Ohio St.3d 456 (2013)
 

STATE EX REL. HOPSON v. CUYAHOGA CTY. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

No. 2012-2161.

135 Ohio St.3d 456 (2013)

2013-Ohio-1911

THE STATE EX REL. HOPSON, Appellant, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 15, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey Hopson, pro se.

Timothy J. McGinty , Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and James E. Moss , Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying relief to appellant, Jeffrey Hopson, on his complaint for a writ of mandamus and/or procedendo. Hopson seeks to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, to issue a sentencing opinion in his criminal case that complies with R.C. 2929.03(F). That statute requires a court or a panel of three judges to state "in a separate opinion" certain findings when...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases