1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 134 Ohio
  5. 134 Ohio St.3d 438 (2012)
 

STATE v. BRUNNING

No. 2011-1066.

134 Ohio St.3d 438 (2012)

2012-Ohio-5752

THE STATE OF OHIO, Appellant, v. BRUNNING, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 6, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Mason , Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. Van , Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Robert L. Tobik , Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Nathaniel J. McDonald , Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

PFEIFER, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, we address the legitimacy of convictions of sex offenders, originally classified under Megan's Law, who were indicted for violating the address-notification requirements of the Adam Walsh Act ("AWA") before State v. Bodyke, 126 Ohio St.3d 266, 2010-Ohio-2424, 933 N.E.2d 753 made the requirements of the AWA inapplicable to such offenders. Specifically in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases