FOLCK v. KHANZADA

Appellate No. 2012-CA-18.

2012 Ohio 4971

NEAL C. FOLCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZAKIR KHANZADA, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Clark County.

Rendered on October 26, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

NEAL C. FOLCK , 4581 Jeremy Avenue, Springfield, Ohio 45502 Plaintiff-Appellant, pro se.

ZAKIR KHANZADA , 1016 Whispering Pines, Centerville, Ohio 45458, Attorney for Defendant-Appellee, pro se.


OPINION

HALL, J.

{¶ 1} Neal C. Folck appeals pro se from the trial court's dismissal of his small-claims complaint against appellee Zakir Khanzada on the basis of res judicata.

{¶ 2} The record reflects that Folck filed his pro se complaint on December 22, 2011, alleging that Khanzada had damaged his pontoon boat and had failed to pay for the damage. (Doc. #1). In response, Khanzada filed a pro se letter that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases