WILTZ v. CLARK SCHAEFER HACKETT & CO.

Nos. 11AP-64, 11AP-282

2011 Ohio 6664

Cassandra Wiltz, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clark Schaefer Hackett & Co. et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth District, Franklin County.

Rendered on December 22, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cassandra Wiltz , pro se.

Pyper Alexander & Nordstrom, LLC, and Thomas H. Pyper , for appellees Clark Schaefer Hackett & Co., and Kent D. Pummel.

Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, LLP, David S. Bloomfield, Jr. , and Ryan P. Sherman , for appellees Schneider Downs and Co., Inc., Joseph Patrick, Roy Lydic, and Bradley P. Tobe.


DECISION

KLATT, J.

{¶1} Plaintiff-appellant, Cassandra Wiltz, has filed an App.R. 26(A) application requesting that this court reconsider our decision in Wiltz v. Clark Schaefer Hackett & Co., 10th Dist. No. 11AP-64 and 11AP-282, 2011-Ohio-5616. For the following reasons, we grant in part and deny in part Wiltz's application for reconsideration.

{¶2} When presented with an application for reconsideration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases