1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 195 Ohio
  5. 195 Ohio App.3d 807 (2011)
 

STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. 94965.

195 Ohio App.3d 807 (2011)

2011-Ohio-5650

The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. WILLIAMS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County.

Decided November 3, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Mason , Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard J. Bombik , Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Craig T. Weintraub , for appellant.

LARRY A. JONES, Judge.

{¶ 1} Pursuant to App.R. 26 and Loc.App.R. 26, this court determined that a conflict existed among this court's decisions on the question of whether evidence of other similar acts is admissible pursuant to Evid.R. 404(B) to demonstrate a scheme, plan, or system when the evidence is not part of the immediate background of the present crime and the offender's identity is not at issue. Accordingly, we granted en banc consideration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases