1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 194 Ohio
  5. 194 Ohio App.3d 630 (2011)
 

EYSOLDT v. PROSCAN IMAGING

Nos. C-100528 and C-100529.

194 Ohio App.3d 630 (2011)

2011-Ohio-2359

EYSOLDT et al., Appellees and Cross-Appellants, et al., v. PROSCAN IMAGING et al.; Go Daddy.com., Inc., Appellant and Cross-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County.

Decided May 18, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William M. Gustavson , for appellees and cross-appellants.

Thompson Hine L.L.P., Christopher M. Bechhold , and Heather M. Hawkins , for appellant and cross-appellee.

DINKELACKER, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant and cross-appellee, Go Daddy.com, Inc., appeals from a judgment entered upon jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs-appellees and cross-appellants, Jeff Eysoldt, Mark Eysoldt, and Jill Eysoldt. The Eysoldts appeal that part of the trial court's judgment granting Go Daddy's motion for a directed verdict on the issue of punitive damages. We affirm the trial court's judgment.

I. Facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases