1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 2011 Ohio
  5. 2011 Ohio 369
 

A.P.M. TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. OHIO PENAL INDUSTRIES

No. 2007-08899.

2011 Ohio 369

A.P.M. Technology, Inc., Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, v. Ohio Penal Industries, Defendant/Counter Plaintiff.

Court of Claims of Ohio.

Filed January 11, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher P. Conomy , Assistant Attorney General, 150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor, Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130.

Mark A. Stuckey , 607 Bimini Drive, Sandusky, Ohio 44870.

Linda R. Van Tine , 1410 Central Avenue, Sandusky, Ohio 44870.

JUDGMENT ENTRY

JOSEPH T. CLARK, Judge.

{¶ 1} On November 30, 2010, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant/counter plaintiff in the amount of $226,198. On December 22, 2010, defendant/counter plaintiff filed a motion for prejudgment interest.

{¶ 2} The Tenth District Court of Appeals has held that "the failure to include prejudgment interest in the prayer for relief operates as a waiver...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases