DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. PRATT

No. 2010-1496.

127 Ohio St.3d 293 (2010)

2010-Ohio-6210

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. PRATT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 22, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan E. Coughlan , Disciplinary Counsel, and Phillip A. King , Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.


Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} Relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a six-count complaint charging that respondent, Gardner Pratt of Loveland, Ohio, had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by holding himself out as an attorney and by performing legal services, including drafting and reviewing legal instruments and contracts, giving legal advice, and negotiating a buyout. Respondent is not, and never has been, admitted to the practice of law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases