IN RE APPLICATION OF MIDDLETOWN COKE CO.

No. 2009-0941.

127 Ohio St.3d 348 (2010)

2010-Ohio-5725

IN RE APPLICATION OF MIDDLETOWN COKE COMPANY; CITY OF MONROE, Appellant; POWER SITING BOARD ET AL., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 1, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Van Kley & Walker, L.L.C., Jack Van Kley , and Christopher A. Walker ; and K. Philip Callahan , Monroe Law Director, for appellant.

Richard Cordray , Attorney General, and Samuel Peterson , Margaret A. Malone , Duane W. Luckey , and Thomas G. Lindgren , Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee, Ohio Power Siting Board.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., M. Howard Petricoff , and Stephen M. Howard , for intervening appellee, Middletown Coke Company.


LANZINGER, J.

{¶ 1} This case comes before us as an appeal from an administrative order of the Power Siting Board. The siting board granted the Middletown Coke Company a certificate to build a "cogeneration station," which is part of an integrated industrial facility that will produce both purified coal and electricity. The city of Monroe, which borders the project site, appeals from that order on four grounds, mainly relating to whether the siting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases