1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 125 Ohio
  5. 125 Ohio St.3d 369 (2010)
 

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MAMICH

No. 2009-2010.

125 Ohio St.3d 369 (2010)

2010-Ohio-1044

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MAMICH.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 25, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Karen H. Osmond, Staff Attorney, for relator.

Zipkin Whiting Co., L.P.A., and David M. Smith, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} Respondent, Samuel Jay Mamich of Beachwood, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0006097, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1973. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we suspend respondent's license to practice for six months, with the entire six months stayed, based on findings that he represented a client's daughter in a legal matter without the daughter's knowledge or consent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases