1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 2009 Ohio
  5. 2009 Ohio 4766
 

TUCKER v. STATE

No. 09-CA-44.

2009 Ohio 4766

Mark E. Tucker, Petitioner-Appellee, v. State of Ohio, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fifth District, Richland County.

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: September 8, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Robinson, Attorney at Law, 3 North Main St., Mansfield, Ohio 44902, for Petitioner-Appellee.

Frank Ardis, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Richland County Prosecutor's Office, 38 South Park, Mansfield, Ohio 44902, Kirsten Psholka-Gartner, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Richland County Prosecutor's Office, 38 South Park, Mansfield, Ohio 44902, for Respondent-Appellant.

Before: Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, P.J., Hon. William B. Hoffman, J., Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J.

OPINION

HOFFMAN, J.

{¶1} Respondent-appellant State of Ohio appeals a judgment of the Richland County Court of Common Pleas, which found Senate Bill 10, Ohio's Adam Walsh Act, to be unconstitutional. Petitioner-appellee is Mark E. Tucker.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE1

{¶2} Appellee was previously convicted of a sex offense. Appellee received notice, effective January 1, 2008, he...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases