Richard Futo, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
State of Ohio, Respondent-Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fifth District, Richland County.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: August 24, 2009.
DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: August 24, 2009.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Richard Futo, Inmate #A524444, Mansfield Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 788, Mansfield, Ohio 44901, for Petitioner-Appellee.
Frank Ardis, Jr., Kirsten Pscholka-Gartner, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney's, Richland County, Ohio, 38 South Park, Mansfield, Ohio 44902, for Respondent-Appellant.
Before: William B. Hoffman, P.J., Julie A. Edwards, J., Patricia A. Delaney, J.
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fifth District, Richland County.
OPINION
EDWARDS, J.
{¶1} Appellant, the State of Ohio, appeals a judgment of the Richland County Common Pleas Court finding Senate Bill 10, Ohio's Adam Walsh Act, to be unconstitutional. Appellee is Richard Futo.
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND CASE
{¶2} In 2007, appellee Richard Futo was found guilty by a jury of two counts of rape with force specifications, two counts of gross sexual imposition and two count...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.