1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 183 Ohio
  5. 183 Ohio App.3d 478 (2009)
 

BLUST v. LAMAR ADVERTISING OF MOBILE, INC.

No. 22917.

183 Ohio App.3d 478 (2009)

2009-Ohio-3947

BLUST et al., Appellants, v. LAMAR ADVERTISING OF MOBILE, INC., et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Montgomery County.

Decided August 7, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Huber, A. Mark Segreti Jr., and David G. Roach, for appellants.

Tucker, Ellis & West, L.L.P., Irene C. Keyse-Walker, and Jon W. Oebker; and Nicholas E. Subashi, for appellees.

GRADY, Judge.

{¶ 1} In 1998, agents for Lamar Advertising Company who were engaged in erecting an advertising billboard on land abutting a farm owned by John and Jean Blust entered the Blusts' property and removed a woodland growth of 34 trees that were growing wild.

{¶ 2} The Blusts commenced an action against Lamar on several claims for relief. Following a trial, the jury returned verdicts awarding the Blusts $32,000 in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases