CINCINNATI CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, Appellee,
v.
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF OHIO et al., Appellants.
Supreme Court of Ohio.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted June 3, 2009.
Decided July 30, 2009.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Bricker & Eckler, L.L.P., Nicholas A. Pittner, James J. Hughes III, Jennifer A. Flint, and Allen Shaffer, for appellee.
Richard Cordray, Attorney General, Benjamin C. Mizer, Solicitor General, Alexandra T. Schimmer, Chief Deputy Solicitor General, Stephen P. Carney, Deputy Solicitor, and Todd R. Marti and Jason Patrick Small, Assistant Solicitors, for appellants.
Supreme Court of Ohio.
LUNDBERG STRATTON, J.
{¶ 1} Appellants, the State Board of Education of Ohio and the Ohio Department of Education, advance the following proposition of law: "A school district with more than 500 employees is an `organization' barred from recovering attorney fees by R.C. 2335.39(A)(2)(d)."
{¶ 2} For the reasons that follow, we hold that a school district board of education is subsumed within the meaning of "organization...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
