1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 183 Ohio
  5. 183 Ohio App.3d 89 (2009)
 

PAXSON v. CITY OF DAYTON

No. 22888.

183 Ohio App.3d 89 (2009)

2009-Ohio-3306

PAXSON, Appellant, v. The CITY OF DAYTON, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Montgomery County.

Decided June 30, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brannon & Associates, Dwight D. Brannon, and Matthew C. Schultz, for appellant.

Green & Green and Thomas M. Green, for appellee.

BROGAN, Judge.

{¶ 1} Mark S. Paxson appeals from the trial court's final order affirming a decision of the Dayton Civil Service Board, which upheld the termination of his employment for violating a city residence requirement.

{¶ 2} Paxson advances three assignments of error on appeal. First, he contends that the trial court erred in not holding that R.C. 9.481 prohibited his discharge for violating the residence requirement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases