SUTPHIN v. LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.

No. 91878.

2009 Ohio 1885

Daymon L. Sutphin Plaintiff-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant, v. Lamson and Sessions Co., et al. Defendants-Appellants/ Cross-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County.

RELEASED: April 23, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glenn R. Jones, Jones, Fund & Associates, 321 North Broadway Street, Medina, Ohio 44256, Attorney for Lamson & Sessions Co.

Paul W. Newendorp, Margolius, Margolius & Associates, 55 Public Square, Suite 1100, Cleveland, Ohio 44113-1901, Attorney for Daymon L. Sutphin.

Nancy Rogers, Ohio Attorney General, By: Dawn M. Tarka, Assistant Attorney General, State Office Building, 11th Floor, 615 West Superior Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44113-1899, Attorney for Bureau of Workers' Compensation.

Before: Sweeney, J., Kilbane, P.J., and Boyle, J.


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

JAMES J. SWEENEY, J.:

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, The Lamson & Sessions Company ("Lamson"), appeals from the trial court order and findings of fact and conclusions of law, which found that the Industrial Commission had jurisdiction to consider the claim for an additional allowance under the ten-year statute of limitations period contained in R.C. 4123.52, filed by plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellant, Daymon L...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases