1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 121 Ohio
  5. 121 Ohio St.3d 29 (2009)
 

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. STUARD

No. 2008-1237.

121 Ohio St.3d 29 (2009)

2009-Ohio-261

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. STUARD, JUDGE. DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BECKER. DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BAILEY.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 29, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Robert R. Berger, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Charles Richards, for respondent Judge Stuard.

Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter, Geoffrey Stern, Rasheeda Khan, and S. Michael Miller, for respondents Becker and Bailey.

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We must decide in this case the appropriate sanctions for a judge who asked an assistant county prosecutor to prepare a sentencing order via ex parte communications, the assistant county prosecutor who prepared the order, and a second assistant county prosecutor, who reviewed it. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline found that the judge violated the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases