1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 121 Ohio
  5. 121 Ohio St.3d 4 (2009)
 

STATE EX REL. HINA v. INDUS. COMM.

No. 2007-1984.

121 Ohio St.3d 4 (2009)

2009-Ohio-250

THE STATE EX REL. HINA, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 28, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larrimer & Larrimer and Thomas L. Reitz, for appellee.

Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Kevin J. Reis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant Industrial Commission.

Lane, Alton & Horst, L.L.C., and Joshua R. Bills, for appellant Anchor Glass Container Corporation.

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} Appellee, David E. Hina, was injured by one of appellant Anchor Glass Container Corporation's ("Anchor's") milling machines, the Cinova 80. He has alleged that his injury is a result of Anchor's violation of a specific safety requirement ("VSSR"). Appellant Industrial Commission of Ohio determined that the Cinova 80 satisfied the applicable specific safety requirements. The

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases