MAYNARD, APPELLEE,
v.
EATON CORPORATION, APPELLANT.
Supreme Court of Ohio.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted March 26, 2008.
Decided September 16, 2008.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Kennedy, Reeve & Knoll and Laren E. Knoll, for appellee.
Brzytwa, Quick & McCrystal, L.L.C., Harry T. Quick, and Matthew L. Snyder, for appellant.
Smith, Rolfes & Skavdahl Co., L.P.A., and Thomas F. Glassman, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys.
Thompson & Bishop and Christy B. Bishop, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Employment Lawyers Association.
Supreme Court of Ohio.
CUPP, J.
{¶ 1} The issue presented in this case is whether the amendment to R.C. 1343.03(A) enacted by 2004 Sub.H.B. No. 212 ("H.B. 212"), 150 Ohio Laws, Part III, 3417 (effective June 2, 2004), adjusts the statutory rate of postjudgment interest on a final judgment entered by a trial court, but when the case is pending on appeal on the effective date of the amended statute. We conclude that the amendment does adjust the rate of interest...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
