RINAT DRAY, Appellant,
v.
STATEN ISLAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, ET AL., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 1, 2024.
Decided May 1, 2024.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael M. Bast, P.C., Brooklyn, NY, for appellant.
Gerspach Sikoscow LLP (Mauro Lilling Naparty LLP, Woodbury, NY [ Caryn L. Lilling and Kathryn M. Beer ], of counsel), for respondents Staten Island University Hospital and James J. Ducey.
Leonid Gorelik and Metropolitan OB-GYN Associates, P.C. Letitia James, Attorney General. New York, NY (Barbara D. Underwood, Ester Murdukhayeva, Galen Sherwin, and Blaire J. Greenwald of counsel), for amicus curiae State of New York.
Birth Rights Bar Association, New York, NY (Elizabeth Kukura of counsel), amicus curiae pro se and for amicus curiae Birth Place Lab.
Washington Square Legal Services, Inc., New York, NY (Sarah Burns and Lynn Paltrow of counsel; Indra Lusero on the brief), for amicus curiae National Advocates for Pregnant Women.
Hayes Klein Law, LLC, New York, NY (Hermine Hayes Klein of counsel), for amici curiae VBAC Facts LLC and Evidence Based Birth.
New York Civil Liberties Union, New York, NY (Jessica Perry, Beth Haroules, Katharine Es Bodde, and Molly K. Biklen of counsel), amicus curiae pro se.
If/When/How: Lawyering for Reproductive Justice, Brooklyn, NY (Farah Diaz-Teller of counsel), amicus curiae pro se and for amici curiae Center for Reproductive Rights, Human Rights and Gender Justice Clinic at the City University of New York Law School (HRSG), White Ribbon Alliance, and Birthrights.
Before: Francesca E. Connolly, J.P., Joseph J. Maltese, Deborah A. Dowling, Carl J. Landicino, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Genine D. Edwards, J.), dated October 1, 2019. The order, sua sponte, in effect, granted the defendants leave to reargue their separate oppositions to the plaintiff's prior motion for leave to amend the amended complaint to assert causes of action alleging breach of contract, fraud, violations of General...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
