IBERDROLA ENERGY PROJECTS v. MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.

Index Nos. 653515/21, 653516/21. Appeal Nos. 250-251, 252, M-1599. Case Nos. 2022-01963, 2022-01964, 2022-02112.

218 A.D.3d 409 (2023)

194 N.Y.S.3d 204

2023 NY Slip Op 03841

Iberdrola Energy Projects, Respondent-Appellant, v. MUFG Union Bank, N.A., et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Defendants. Iberdrola Energy Projects, Respondent-Appellant, v. Zions Bancorporation, N.A., Doing Business as Zions First National Bank, Appellant-Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided July 13, 2023.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mayer Brown LLP, New York ( Rory K. Schneider of counsel), for MUFG Union Bank, N.A., BNP Paribas S.A., BNP Paribas Fortis, CIT Bank, N.A., Cobank ACB, Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, S.A., GE Capital EFS Financing, Inc., Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited, New York Branch, Migdal Insurance Company, Ltd., Migdal Makefet Pension and Provident Funds, Ltd., Mizuho Bank, Ltd., Natwest Markets PLC, Norddeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale, New York Branch, SPT Infrastructure Finance Sub-2, Ltd., Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank Limited, New York Branch, Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, Yozma Pension Fund of Self-Employed Ltd., and Zions Bancorporation, N.A., appellants-respondents.

Eversheds Sutherland (US), New York ( David A. Wender , of the bar of the State of Georgia, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for Truist Bank, appellant-respondent.

Steptoe & Johnson LLP, New York ( Robert W. Mockler of counsel), and Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Los Angeles, CA ( Thomas B. Watson of the bar of the State of California, admitted pro hac vice of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Concur—Kern, J.P., Friedman, Gesmer, Moulton, Rodriguez, JJ.


Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Jennifer Schecter, J.), entered April 5, 2022, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants' motion to dismiss the claims for aiding and abetting tortious interference with contract, conspiracy to commit tortious interference with contract, conversion, and unjust enrichment, and granted their motion to dismiss the claim for unfair trade practices under Massachusetts General Laws,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases