1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 217 A.D.3d
  5. 217 A.D.3d 599 (2023)
 

MATTER OF ELIZABETH ST. GARDEN, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Index Nos. 152341/19, 152561/19. Appeal Nos. 555-556 & M-2023-2000-2023-2459. Case Nos. 2022-05170, 2022-05466.

217 A.D.3d 599 (2023)

192 N.Y.S.3d 102

2023 NY Slip Op 03434

In the Matter of Elizabeth Street Garden, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. City of New York et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Friends of Elizabeth Street Garden et al., Respondents, v. City of New York et al., Appellants, et al., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided June 27, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix , Corporation Counsel, New York ( Mackenzie Fillow of counsel), for municipal appellants-respondents.

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, New York ( Kerry T. Cooperman of counsel), for Habitat for Humanity New York City Inc., appellant.

Perkins Coie LLP, New York ( Benjamin Estes of counsel), for RiseBoro Community Partnership Inc., appellant.

Michael S. Gruen , New York, for Friends of Elizabeth Street Garden, Deborah Glick, Yuh-Line Niou, Jeannine Kiely, Kent Barwick, Emily Hellstrom and Barry Loewer, respondents.

Siegel Teitelbaum & Evans, LLP, New York ( Norman Siegel , Herbert Teitelbaum and Goutam Jois of counsel), and McLaughlin & Stern LLP, New York ( Oliver R. Chernon of counsel), for Elizabeth Street Garden, Inc., Renee Green, Elizabeth Street, Inc., Elizabeth Firehouse LLC, and Allan Reiver, respondents-appellants.

Balestriere Fariello, New York ( Vittoria M. Fariello of counsel), for amicus curiae.

Concur—Webber, J.P., Singh, Kennedy, Scarpulla, Pitt-Burke, JJ.

Order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered November 1, 2022, which, to the extent appealed from, granted the petition to annul the November 9, 2018 negative declaration of respondent New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) as arbitrary and capricious insofar as it found under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) (ECL art 8) that a proposed low-income senior housing development...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases