1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 214 A.D.3d
  5. 214 A.D.3d 427 (2023)
 

WATSON v. LAMPKIN

114873/08. Appeal No. 17441. Case No. 2022-03255.

214 A.D.3d 427 (2023)

185 N.Y.S.3d 66

2023 NY Slip Op 01154

Audrey Watson, Plaintiff, and One 9 Three 9 Corporation, Appellant, v. Vincent Sollazzo Lampkin et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided March 2, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ginsburg & Misk LLP, Queens Village ( Christopher Ryan Clarke of counsel), for appellant.

Geovanny Fernandez Attorney at Law, Bronx ( Geovanny Fernandez of counsel), for Vincent Sollazo Lampkin, respondent.

John S. James , New York, for Estate of Lillian Lampkin, respondent.

Concur—Singh, J.P., Moulton, González, Shulman, JJ.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Alexander M. Tisch, J.), entered June 7, 2022, which, to the extent appealed from, dismissed the complaint and adjudged plaintiff-appellant's interest in the property invalid, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The trial court correctly concluded that a corporate acknowledgment did not show the requisite proof of corporate authority to convey the property by deed in 1996 (see Galetta v Galetta,<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases