ISNADY v. WALDEN PRESERV., L.P.

2021-01542. Index No. 7058/16.

208 A.D.3d 568 (2022)

173 N.Y.S.3d 49

2022 NY Slip Op 04904

Will Isnady, Appellant, v. Walden Preservation, L.P., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided August 10, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry D. Haberman , New City, NY, for appellant.

London Fischer LLP, New York, NY ( Brian P. McLaughlin and Myra Needleman of counsel), for respondent.

Barros, J.P., Maltese, Wooten and Zayas, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof dismissing, in effect, so much of the amended complaint, insofar as asserted against the defendant Walden Preservation, L.P., as sought a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has an easement of ingress and egress based on adverse possession and a prescriptive easement of ingress and egress over the disputed property, and adding thereto a provision in favor of the defendant Walden Preservation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases