Plaintiff was an attorney at the law firm of nominal defendant Goldfarb & Gerzog. He claims that he and defendant Goldfarb were partners at the firm and that he was entitled to a one-third share of the firm's profits. Defendant Migden was the firm's accountant.
Issues of fact exist as to plaintiff's partnership status and entitlement to a share of the firm's profits (see generally M.I.F. Sec. Co. v Stamm & Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.