MAX MARKUS KATZ, P.C. v. STERLING NATL. BANK

Index No. 156857/18, Appeal No. 16195, Case No. 2021-01000.

206 A.D.3d 533 (2022)

171 N.Y.S.3d 90

2022 NY Slip Op 04097

Max Markus Katz, P.C., et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Sterling National Bank, Respondent-Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided June 23, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Max Markus Katz, Cedarhurst, for appellants-respondents.

Cullen and Dykman, LLP, New York ( Samit G. Patel of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Webber, Gesmer, Scarpulla, Shulman, JJ.


We decline to consider plaintiffs' argument that defendant's pleading should be stricken for failure to provide discovery. The "issues which we may consider are limited by the notice of appeal" (Torres v City of New York, 41 A.D.3d 312, 313 [1st Dept 2007] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Because plaintiffs' notice of appeal does not mention sanctions, they have waived their right...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases