The court correctly concluded that defendant was ineligible for modification of his sex offender status. Defendant was adjudicated a level one offender on his conviction of unlawful surveillance in the second degree. There is no risk level designated in the statute that is lower than level one. Thus, defendant's petition pursuant to Correction Law § 168-o(2) is really an application to be relieved of any further duty to register, as a purportedly nondangerous offender...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
