MAJADA INC. v. E&A RE CAPITAL CORP.

Index No. 29219/19E. Appeal No. 16042. Case No. 2021-04640.

205 A.D.3d 648 (2022)

170 N.Y.S.3d 18

2022 NY Slip Op 03476

Majada Inc., Appellant, v. E&A RE Capital Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 31, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fadullon Dizon Krul, LLP, Jericho ( Juan Paolo Dizon and Alexander Krul of counsel), for appellant.

Shiryak, Bowman, Anderson, Gill & Kadochnikov, LLP, Kew Gardens ( Matthew J. Routh of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Webber, J.P., Kern, Oing, Scarpulla, Pitt, JJ.


Supreme Court should have denied E&A's cross motion insofar as it sought to compel plaintiff to accept its untimely answer, as E&A failed to show a reasonable excuse for its default in serving the answer (CPLR 3012[d]; see Nouveau El. Indus., Inc. v Tracey Towers Hous. Co., 95 A.D.3d 616, 618 [1st Dept 2012]). E&A asserted that it did not receive the summons and complaint,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases