ABOELNAGA v. NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA

654430/20. Appeal No. 16112. Case No. 2022-00546.

205 A.D.3d 636 (2022)

170 N.Y.S.3d 20

2022 NY Slip Op 03467

Mona Aboelnaga, Respondent, v. National Bank of Canada et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 31, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brody & Browne LLP, New York ( Lauren Reiter Brody of counsel), for appellants.

Sack & Sack, LLP, New York ( Jonathan S. Sack and Queenie Paniague of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Kapnick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Gesmer, Shulman, Rodriguez, JJ.


Plaintiff's claim that NBC and NBF are defendant Proctor Investment Managers LLC's (PIM) alter egos is barred by both res judicata (see e.g. Matter of Hunter, 4 N.Y.3d 260, 269 [2005]) and collateral estoppel (see e.g. Koch v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., 62 N.Y.2d 548, 554 [1984], cent denied 469 U.S. 1210 [1985]). In 2016, plaintiff sued NBC, NBF, and PIM, alleging —as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases