1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 205 A.D.3d
  5. 205 A.D.3d 429 (2022)
 

PARK EX REL. MA UWS NEW YORK, INC. v. KIM

Index No. 655212/18. Appeal No. 15863. Case No. 2021-00603.

205 A.D.3d 429 (2022)

168 N.Y.S.3d 436

2022 NY Slip Op 02956

Heijung Park, Individually and on Behalf of MA UWS New York, Inc., Appellant, v. Nam Yong Kim et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 3, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kimm Law Firm, New York ( Michael S. Kimm of counsel), for appellant.

Kim & Bae, P.C., New York ( Joshua B. Sears of counsel), for respondents.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Gesmer, Moulton, Mendez, Higgitt, JJ.

In support of her motion to vacate, plaintiff offered a reasonable excuse of law office failure supported by counsel's affirmation (CPLR 5015[a]; 2005). The supporting documentation indicates that plaintiff's counsel was short-staffed at the outset of the pandemic and believed that a reply to the counterclaims had been prepared and filed so that the motion for a default would be withdrawn, as he had withdrawn his previous motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases