After an evidentiary hearing, Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion, in which he claimed that the attorney who represented him at his trial had a conflict of interest because this attorney and the attorney representing the codefendant were allegedly members of the same de facto law firm. There is no basis for disturbing the court's detailed findings of fact, in which it credited the testimony of both counsel that they were separately incorporated, had separate...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
