Plaintiff's prior summary judgment motion concerned two promissory notes that were provided in connection with three loans by plaintiff to defendant Fox between March and October 2014. The third note, which was the subject of the instant motion, had not matured at the time the prior motion was filed. Thus, nonpayment of that note was not an available ground for summary judgment at that time, and the instant motion is therefore not an improper successive summary judgment motion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
