FISCHER v. CENTENE CORP.

Index No. 657596/19. Appeal No. 15801. Case No. 2021-02336.

204 A.D.3d 565 (2022)

165 N.Y.S.3d 297

2022 NY Slip Op 02755

James Fischer, Appellant, v. Centene Corp. et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided April 26, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Fischer, appellant pro se.

Nixon Peabody LLP, Jericho ( Christopher J. Porzio of counsel), for respondents.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Kapnick, Gesmer, Moulton, Shulman, JJ.


Supreme Court correctly dismissed the complaint because plaintiff failed to allege cognizable damages, which is a required element of all the causes of action alleged in the complaint (see e.g. Stutman v Chemical Bank, 95 N.Y.2d 24, 29 [2000]; Kenford Co. v County of Erie, 67 N.Y.2d 257, 261 [1986]; Laribee Wire v NRT Metals, 102 A.D.2d 705, 706...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases