A preponderance of the evidence supports the finding that respondent neglected the eldest child by inflicting excessive corporal punishment upon her (see Family Ct Act §§ 1012[f][i][B]; 1046[b][i]). The child's out-of-court statement that respondent physically fought with her was corroborated by the youngest child's out-of-court statements, which were submitted through a caseworker's testimony, as well as respondent's own out-of-court statements and testimony...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
