The court providently exercised its discretion in its determination that appellant failed to establish a substantial change of circumstances sufficient to warrant vacatur of his juvenile delinquency adjudication pursuant to Family Court Act § 355.1(1)(b). Although appellant complied with the terms of his conditional discharge, his compliance alone was insufficient to establish a change of circumstances, particularly because both the offense and completion of the requirements...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
