Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Defendant preserved his challenge to the court's initial Sandoval ruling, but failed to preserve his challenge to the court's ruling that the defense expert's testimony opened the door to cross-examination of both the expert and defendant about additional prior bad acts, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that all of those rulings were provident exercises of discretion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
