PEOPLE v. MACK

2014-09703. Ind. No. 1521/13.

203 A.D.3d 1178 (2022)

165 N.Y.S.3d 702

2022 NY Slip Op 02134

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jonathan Mack, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided March 30, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stacey Eves, Long Beach, NY, for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Anne T. Donnelly , District Attorney, Mineola, NY ( Kevin C. King and Donald Berk of counsel), for respondent.

Barros, J.P., Rivera, Wooten and Ford, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly precluded the defendant from introducing purported prior inconsistent statements by a prosecution witness, because by failing to confront that witness with the statements and asking her whether she made them, the defendant failed to lay a proper foundation for their admission (compare People v Oliver, 193 A.D.3d 1081, 1082-1083 [2021], and People v Robertson, 172 A.D.3d 1239, 1239-1240...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases