FRIEDLANDER v. JACK'S HOLDINGS INC.

Index No. 653210/19. Appeal No. 15554. Case No. 2021-02392.

203 A.D.3d 573 (2022)

162 N.Y.S.3d 710

2022 NY Slip Op 01964

Robert Friedlander, Appellant, v. Jack's Holdings Inc., Doing Business as Jack's Stir Brew Coffee, et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided March 22, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bell Law PLLC, New York ( Salvatore Compoccia of counsel), for appellant.

Landman Corsi Ballaine & Ford P.C., New York ( Daniel S. Moretti of counsel), for respondents.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Singh, Kennedy, Scarpulla, JJ.


Initially, we reject defendants' contention that plaintiff failed to prove the existence of an enforceable contract. The evidence demonstrates "a manifestation of mutual assent sufficiently definite to assure that the parties are truly in agreement with respect to all material terms," as set forth by plaintiff and expressly approved by the company defendants' chief financial officer and by defendant Mazzola, the chief executive officer (Stonehill Capital Mgt. LLC v Bank...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases