Sainplice's contention that the affidavit submitted by Wesco was not properly notarized by a notary public's stamped or printed signature is meritless (see Executive Law § 137). The key requisite of a signature is intent; thus, printed and typewritten signatures have been upheld as valid (see General Construction Law § 46; Brooklyn City R.R. Co. v City of New York, 139 Misc. 691, 691-692 [App Term, 2d Dept 1930]; Parkhill v Cleary,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
WESCO INS. CO. v. HI-RISE STEEL INC.
160190/19. Appeal No. 15454. Case No. 2021-02948.
203 A.D.3d 481 (2022)
160 N.Y.S.3d 861
2022 NY Slip Op 01432
Wesco Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Hi-Rise Steel Inc. et al., Respondents, and Samuel Sainplice, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 8, 2022.
Decided March 8, 2022.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Elefterakis Elefterakis & Panek, New York ( Gennaro Savastano of counsel), for appellant.
Kennedys CMK LLP, New York ( Max W. Gershweir of counsel), for Hi-Rise Steel Inc., Amram Tuizer and John Doe, respondents.
Concur—Kapnick, J.P., Gesmer, Oing, Singh, Scarpulla, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
