CATANIA v. LIRIANO

21709/19. Appeal No. 15446-15446A. Case Nos. 2020-04758, 2021-02891.

203 A.D.3d 422 (2022)

164 N.Y.S.3d 581

2022 NY Slip Op 01382

Patricia Catania, Appellant-Respondent, v. Mercedes Liriano et al., Defendants, and William Woodruff et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided March 3, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Anthony V. Gentile, Brooklyn ( Anthony V. Gentile of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Law Office of Robert T. Reilly, NYSUT, New York ( Meaghean Murphy of counsel), for respondents-appellants.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Gesmer, Moulton, Rodriguez, Pitt, JJ.


To the extent the court rejected plaintiff's cross motion for a judgment declaring Section 13 unconstitutional on the procedural basis that plaintiff sought to assert this claim in a cross motion rather than by seeking leave to amend the complaint, the court was not required to correct the procedural defect, even if it could have exercised its discretion to convert the cross motion into a motion for leave to amend, and the procedural...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases