Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the County Court should have granted that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence because the testimony of the arresting officer at the suppression hearing was incredible as a matter of law and patently tailored to meet constitutional objections. This contention is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant failed to raise this specific contention before the court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
