Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, that the felony complaint was facially insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review since he never challenged the sufficiency of the felony complaint at his arraignment or in a subsequent motion. In any event, the contention has been rendered academic, since the felony complaint was superseded by an indictment (see People v Clark,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.