Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In 2004, the plaintiff buyer and the defendant seller entered into a contract for the sale of real property located in Brooklyn. No closing occurred and the plaintiff commenced an action for specific performance. Although the Supreme Court awarded the plaintiff that relief, this Court reversed, as a time of the essence closing had never been scheduled and the plaintiff did not demonstrate that he had tendered performance...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
