SIGALOVSKAYA v. NEW YORK CITY TR. AUTH.

Index No. 451333/18. Appeal No. 15186. Case No. 2021-03438.

202 A.D.3d 423 (2022)

158 N.Y.S.3d 569

2022 NY Slip Op 00641

Karina Sigalovskaya, Respondent, v. New York City Transit Authority, Defendant, and MTA Bus Company et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided February 1, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris Duffy Alonso Faley & Pitcoff, New York ( Iryna S. Krauchanka and Andrea M. Alonso of counsel), for appellants.

William Schwitzer & Associates, P.C., New York ( D. Allen Zachary of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Kern, J.P., Friedman, Singh, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, JJ.


In opposition to plaintiff's showing that defendants' vehicle rear-ended her vehicle, defendants offered the explanation that plaintiff's vehicle stopped abruptly. This assertion fails to constitute a nonnegligent explanation for the accident that would raise an issue of fact as to liability, since it does not explain why defendant driver failed to maintain a safe distance between his vehicle and the one ahead of it (see Urena v GVC Ltd., 160 A.D.3d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases