1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 201 A.D.3d
  5. 201 A.D.3d 535 (2022)
 

RENK v. RENK

Index No. 652439/18. Appeal No. 15083. Case No. 2021-00961.

201 A.D.3d 535 (2022)

157 N.Y.S.3d 377

2022 NY Slip Op 00291

Kimberly Renk, Appellant-Respondent, v. Richard Renk, Sr., et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided January 18, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michel O. Weisz P.A., Miami, FL ( Michel O. Weisz of the bar of the State of Florida, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Akerman LLP, New York ( Frederick Andrew Braunstein of counsel), for respondents-appellants.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Webber, Oing, Scarpulla, Pitt, JJ.

On a prior appeal, this Court held that defendant Richard Renk, Sr.'s codicil, which referred unequivocally to the oral agreement sued upon, raised issues of fact as to whether it served to revive the limitations period for plaintiff's contract claims under General Obligations Law § 17-101 (Renk v Renk, 188 A.D.3d 502, 503 [1st Dept 2020]). That holding is law of the case (Carmona...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases