NARIS v. HAMILTON

Index No. 29505/17. Appeal No. 14977. Case No. 2021-00600.

201 A.D.3d 439 (2022)

156 N.Y.S.3d 736

2022 NY Slip Op 00049

Nandranie Naris, Respondent, v. Andra Hamilton et al., Defendants, and Lufthansa Cargo Aktiengesellschaft, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided January 6, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nicoletti Hornig & Sweeney, New York ( Guerric S.D.L. Russell of counsel), for appellant.

Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York ( Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Webber, J.P., Friedman, Oing, Moulton, Kennedy, JJ.


Because the CSTS is designated as "Sensitive Security Information" under federal law (see 49 CFR 1520.5[b]), federal law prohibits Lufthansa from disclosing it without authorization from the relevant federal agency (see 49 CFR 1520.9[a]), subject to certain exceptions not relevant here. Supreme Court, in granting the motion to compel, should not have directed Lufthansa to disclose the CSTS in violation of federal law.

We have considered the parties'...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases